Saturday, 22 October 2011

Deregulation Enables Investment Fraud














A big shout out to Occupy Vancouver and to the Surrey protest against George Bush. We are told that Occupy Wall Street protest was first inspired by Adbusters, an anti Corpora media outlet base in Vancouver, BC. We are told they were the ones that first proposed the "What if" thousands of protesters occupied Wall Street? The idea caught on dramatically.

I was wondering why they were kind of mumbling and repeating each other over and over again at the Occupation and what everyone raising both hands wiggling was all about. One participant explained that was zombie talk. It represents how in society and in corporate media people tend to be like zombies and just repeat what ever they hear without verifying it's truthfulness. When they ask does everyone agree and everyone responds with the wiggling hands that is mocking how people tend to be like sheep and ignorantly agree with whatever the media feeds them.

The Occupy movement has been criticized of not having clear goals or a clear set of demands. In response to that criticism, Adbusters came up with one possible proposal, the Robin Hood Tax. A tiny tax on financial transactions on Wall Street that would encourage traders to stop jumping back and forth between investments so rapidly which creates such unstable speculation that would be enough money to fund every social program imaginable. Not a bad idea.

Personally, I'm not big on commission fees. I like it like how Manulife lets you diversify and move your RRSP investments between mutual funds without commission charges. I see commission charges as sharks exploiting investors. Yet taxing the sharks does seem palatable.

Nevertheless, my concern isn't taking from the rich and giving to the poor. My concern is the huge amount of investment fraud that goes on in the market that is completely unregulated. Madoff claimed he was just one of many fraudsters on Wall Street. My main concern is how deregulation enables investment fraud.

One would normally think that reducing red tape to let business thrive is a good thing. However, in practice all we have seen is that reducing regulation and red tape has simply made it easier for white collar criminals to commit investment fraud. When Reagan deregulated the banks, that opened the flood gates of corruption wide open.

George Bush's son Neil was a director of a bank in Colorado during the savings and loans scandal in the /80's. He used his position on the banks BOD to approve a loan for one of the family's fake oil companies that were over inflated and ripped people off. When the company paid his salary and ran off with the money, it defaulted on the bank loan which was bailed out with tax dollars. Al Martin claims the Bush family had many of these fake Texas oil well companies and committed extensive amount of fraud through them in Texas which helped collapse Mcorp and create the Savings and loan crisis in the /80's.

Evidently they used that practice operation in Texas on the rest of the country years later with the promise that the banks would be bailed out with tax dollars and that they were. My concerns are banking fraud, real estate fraud and investment fraud. Vancouver doesn't have a stock exchange any more. We used to. Vancouver is a big city not to have a stock exchange. The reason it was disbanded was because the media found out how corrupt it was. It was full of fake pump and dump stocks and they simply couldn't control the fraud.

We have clearly seen that deregulation hasn't resulted in a more profitable business environment. We have simply seen how deregulation has enabled investment fraud which in essence steals our pensions, destabilizes the market, adversely affects the economy and increases taxes.

The 9/11 truth movement is well represented at the Occupy Vancouver protest. They rightfully ask about Tower 7, the third tower that fell in New York when no planes hit it. Interesting to note that aside from military and CIA records, the Tower was the headquarters of the Wall street Watch dog that investigated investment fraud. You don't have to be a Communist to be concerned about investment fraud stealing your hard earned pensions.

Saturday, 1 October 2011

Cocaine in Operation Fast and Furious















Operation Fast and Furious has made the news of late as being a huge scandal where government agencies sold a Mexican drug cartel arms and brought back tons of cocaine to be sold in the US. Everyone is rightfully outrages that government agencies were selling guns to a Mexican drug cartel. One of those guns was used to kill a US border agent.

Yet it's also important to remember that this typical drugs for arms mission saw government agencies letting tons of cocaine be smuggled into the United States. “According to court transcripts, Niebla was allowed to import “multi-ton quantities of cocaine” into the U.S. as a result of his working relationship with the FBI, Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration.”

Operation Fast and Furious may be a new scandal breaking in the news but it simply reinforces what was going on out of Mena, Arkansas for years.

Friday, 15 July 2011

John Prescott Ellis





















Prescott, that name sounds familiar. John Prescott Ellis is the nephew of George H W Bush and the first cousin of George W Bush. In fact, Jeb Bush, George W's brother has a son named John Ellis Bush Jr.

The interesting thing about John Prescott Ellis is his use of his cousin's name to promote investment fraud. We'll remember John from his involvement with Fox News on the Election 2000 media coverage.

Yet the voter fraud in Florida is an important but separate issue. What I want to examine is Ellis' documented connection to investment fraud and how he used his position with the Bush Administration to endorse that fraud.

Let's look at this court decision involving Robert Nichols and John Ellis. The Bayou entities were various names for an investment fraud. In spring of 2004, after the scam started to unravel, Samuel Israel transferred $120 million to his own account then gave $10 million to Robert Nichols.

On or about April 2004, virtually all of the contents of the Bayou Hedge Funds' brokerage accounts were wired into a bank account entitled "Bayou Management LLC Special Account."

On or about July 8 2004, Samuel Israel caused $120 million to be transferred from Bayou Management to a bank account in Israel's name at the Deutsche Postbank in Hamburg, Germany. ("The Fraudulent Transfer" paragraph 15)

Three days after the Fraudulent transfer, Israel then transferred $10 million to Robert Nichols. (The Recoverable Transfer" paragraph 25)

Robert Nichols counter sued claiming the million dollars seized from a London safety deposit box was part of the $10 million service fee he charged Israel and was his. I kid you not.

Mr. Nichols believes that the services that he provided to Israel  involved matters of national interest. Mr. Nichols was advised by Israel and others that Israel's pursuit of the Project  was known to and sanctioned by the Government.

Confirmation of the government sanction and the general legitimacy of the project was communicated to Mr. Nichols by Mr. John P Ellis, who at the time was involved with GH Venture Partners of New York, New York a company that enjoyed (and enjoys) an honorable reputation.

Mr. Ellis is the first cousin of President George W. Bush and his material involvement with President Bush's 2004 political campaign (particularly in Florida) was reported in the general press. (Paragraphs 19 - 21)

The Street wrote an in depth three page report on the Bayou scam. They claim John P. Ellis, represented several companies in investment presentations to IM Partners, a side venture set up by Samuel Israel and Daniel Marino. Israel and Marino were the management team that ran Bayou and who federal prosecutors allege defrauded investors out of $300 million.

One of the deals arranged by Ellis and GH Ventures was a $10 million investment by IM Partners in Kycos, a defunct off-shore company that specialized in performing corporate background checks and due diligence for online gambling sites.

Wednesday, 13 July 2011

George H W Bush as Director of the CIA



















George H W Bush was Director of the CIA in 1976. He replaced William Colby who came in after the Watergate scandal broke. In December 1974, Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh broke the news of the "Family Jewels" in a front-page article in The New York Times, revealing that the CIA had assassinated foreign leaders, and had conducted surveillance on some seven thousand American citizens involved in the antiwar movement (Operation CHAOS).

Colby believed that the CIA had a moral obligation to cooperate with the Congress and demonstrate that the CIA was accountable to the Constitution. This caused a major rift within the CIA ranks, with many old-line officers such as former DCI Richard Helms believing that the CIA should have resisted congressional intrusion. In steps George H W Bush.

Bush's confirmation as the Director of Central Intelligence was opposed by many politicians and citizens who were still reeling from the Watergate scandal (when Bush was the head of the Republican National Committee, and a steadfast defender of Nixon) and the Church Committee investigating whether CIA-ordered foreign assassinations were being directed towards domestic officials, including President Kennedy. Bush was replaced as director of the CIA by Stansfield Turner who was appointed by President Jimmy Carter.

I'm not going to claim that the Bush family were the creators of the CIA corruption but I will say they were directly tied to it. The first obvious record of serious CIA corruption was under Allen W. Dulles who was a friend of the Bush family and helped cover up their dealings with Nazi Germany during the war. Dulles worked with Barry Seal and was the Director of the CIA who signed and submitted Operation Northwoods. Before that Dulles was involved with Operation Ajax in Iran.

Having the Rockefeller Commission investigate the CIA's involvement with Watergate and assassinations was as ironic as appointing Allen Dulles to the Warren Commission to investigate CIA corruption and involvement with JFK's assassination.

The Mena Connection

















The pivotal event that began to unravel the mystery of Mena was the death of  Don Henry age 16, and Kevin Ives age 17. The initial report claimed they fell asleep on railway tracks and was hit by a train. Which didn't really make sense.

The conductor of the train saw something on the track and kept blasting the horn long in advance. When he saw it was human bodies he slammed on the brakes. All that noise would have woken the boys from their sleep.

Fahmy MalakArkansas's state medical examiner, then said the boys had smoked so much marijuana that they were in too much of a support to wake up from the noise. Not only did that not make sense either, they didn't even perform a test to see if there really was any thc in their system.

Because of the mother's persistence, Kevin and Don's bodies were exhumed, new autopsies were performed, and a grand jury was convened. Dr. Joseph Burton, a nationally recognized forensic pathologist from out-of-state, performed the new autopsies. His findings revealed that Don Henry had been stabbed in the back and Kevin Ives' face had been smashed by a blow from a rifle butt before their bodies were placed on the railroad tracks.

Burton's autopsy also revealed that Malak had mutilated Kevin's skull by sawing it in so many different directions that it was impossible to tell where the original skull fractures were. Malak also had completely dismantled Kevin's jaw bones. Burton stated he had performed thousands of autopsies and had never seen anything like it. Was Malak trying to hide something?

"A former employee at the crime lab has said he discovered what appeared to be evidence of a stab wound during the original autopsy, but was told, quote, 'not to worry about it.' Malak has refused all comment."


Nevertheless, both Governor Clinton and the Arkansas State Medical Examiner Commission Chairman, Jocelyn Elders, who had the power to remove Malak from office, not only insisted he remain, they gave him a raise.

It's a long and complicated story but the fact is, two boys were found dead and the Arkansas State medical examiner tampered with evidence and covered up the murder to look like a suicide or an accident. He was supported by Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton. That is the key to Mena.


There were other murders Fahmy Malak investigated and fraudulently ruled as suicides. This case is complicated because it was claimed the boys saw something they weren't supposed to see and were murdered as a result.

It was claimed that they had witnessed one of the many drug drops that transpired in Mena which is at first hard to believe. Yet it turns out there was an extensive drug for arms trafficking that went on out of Mena. Barry Seal's brother admitted how the drug drops occurred. He said they flew in at a low altitude and pushed the drugs out of the plane in duffel bags on a aluminum pallet attached to a parachute.

He claimed the drugs were pushed out of the plane at around 1000 feet and as soon as the parachute opened the pallet hit the ground and unfolded. It is very possible Kevin and Don saw one of these drug drops. The fact is, they were murdered and it was made to look like they died an accidental death which was blatantly covered up by the crooked State Medical Examiner who was supported by Governor Bill Clinton.

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Children’s Defense Fund




















 

There has been a lot of concerns raised about the Children’s Defense Fund. The name of the fund sounds so innocent. Catholic groups have expressed the concern that putting abortion clinics in schools isn't defending children.

I realize abortion is a pretty passionate issue. Obviously birth control is a better choice than abortion, yet that's only the first red flag. If a Haiti relief fund gives $3 million for mortgage loans in Haiti and it raises well over $100 million, one is forced to ask what happened to the rest of the money?

One source claims: In 1993, Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta met with Vince Foster in Geneva, Switzerland. Foster had traveled there to make a special pickup of a disbursement that had been formally requested by the President of the United States, Bill Clinton. According to Wanta, he had been working on "Seal projects" and had been requested to transfer $250 million to an account that was retrievable by Foster.

The account was destined for the "Children’s Defense Fund," hardly a "Seal" project. Wanta arranged for three payments, approximately $81 million dollars each, to be made and converted to U.S. Treasury notes which were given to Foster, who then gave them to Hillary Clinton.

Accusations have been made that claim the Children’s Defense Fund is in reality a CIA slush fund run by Hillary Clinton. "If the "Children’s Defense Fund" is actually a CIA operation, then one must also conclude that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a CIA operative."

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald claims he is in possession of filmed evidence allegedly showing Senator Hillary Clinton entering Bank Crozier in Grenada during early 2003 for the purpose of withdrawing stolen and laundered U.S. Treasury funds.

The Wanta Chronicles claims Leo Emil Wanta was tied to Bill and Hillary Clinton. Former CIA agent Ray McGovern was physically removed by security during Hillary's speech praising free speech in Egypt.  Suleiman is linked with the CIA.

One has to wonder that if the CIA are low enough to misappropriate a Children’s Defense Fund, would they not do the same thing for Haiti earthquake relief?

The Bush Family Investment Fraud





















Al Martin's book, The Conspirators is the definitive resource of the extensive investment fraud the Bush family have been involved with. He claims he worked directly with Jeb Bush who directed him to set up fraudulent loans to invest in fake oil companies and intentionally default on the loan. Thus referred to as the double scam. Al Martin claims the Bush family were involved with National Heritage.